Skip to content
EdNC. Essential education news. Important stories. Your voice.

Search ednc.org

The history and impact of Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg

Share this story

Our republishing policy

EdNC is a nonprofit, online, daily, independent newspaper. All of EdNC’s content is open source and free to republish. Please use the following guidelines when republishing our content.
  • Our content must be republished in full. If your organization uses a paywall, the content must be provided in full for free.
  • Credit our team by including both the author name and EdNC.org in the byline. Example: Alex Granados, EdNC.org.
  • If republishing the story online, please provide a link to EdNC.org or a link to the original article in either the byline or credit line.
  • The original headline of the article must be used. Allowable edits to the content of the piece include changes to meet your publication’s style guide and references to dates (i.e. this week changed to last week). Other edits must be approved by emailing Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected].
  • Photos and other multimedia elements (audio, video, etc.) may not be republished without prior permission. Please email Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected] if you are interested in sharing a multimedia element.
  • If you republish a story, please let us know by emailing Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected].

Please email Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected] if you have any questions. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Canonical tag

Please include the following canonical tag in the <head> of the republished story.

<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.ednc.org/the-history-and-impact-of-swann-v-charlotte-mecklenburg/">

HTML content

This includes the title, byline, content, and tracking pixel required for republishing this story.

This story is tagged:

Forty-five years ago today, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, establishing busing programs in Charlotte and across the South to help desegregate public schools.

Adam Rhew has a feature today exploring what’s happened in Charlotte public schools since the decision. Below, we have three videos from a recent event at the UNC School of Law: “45 Years Later: Celebrating Swann, Examining the Judicial Retreat from School Integration, and Imagining a Path Forward.”

First up, David Neal, a staff attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center and Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation Trustee, documents the years after the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and declared segregated schools unconstitutional. Many areas attempted to find ways to fight or undermine the decision until Swann laid the foundation for busing to integrate schools.

Next up, Adam Stein, founding partner of Ferguson, Stein, Chambers, Gresham & Sumter, tells the story of the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg case, which was fought by his partner Julius Chambers.

Finally, Jack Boger, the former dean of the UNC School of Law, explores desegregation litigation between the Swann case in 1971 and Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education in 2002. The U.S. Supreme Court decided in Belk that Charlotte-Mecklenburg public schools had become desegregated and busing was no longer needed.

On this historic day, tell us what you think.