Skip to content
EdNC. Essential education news. Important stories. Your voice.

Search ednc.org

Day 17 of the Convention

Share this story

Our republishing policy

EdNC is a nonprofit, online, daily, independent newspaper. All of EdNC’s content is open source and free to republish. Please use the following guidelines when republishing our content.
  • Our content must be republished in full. If your organization uses a paywall, the content must be provided in full for free.
  • Credit our team by including both the author name and EdNC.org in the byline. Example: Alex Granados, EdNC.org.
  • If republishing the story online, please provide a link to EdNC.org or a link to the original article in either the byline or credit line.
  • The original headline of the article must be used. Allowable edits to the content of the piece include changes to meet your publication’s style guide and references to dates (i.e. this week changed to last week). Other edits must be approved by emailing Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected].
  • Photos and other multimedia elements (audio, video, etc.) may not be republished without prior permission. Please email Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected] if you are interested in sharing a multimedia element.
  • If you republish a story, please let us know by emailing Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected].

Please email Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected] if you have any questions. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Canonical tag

Please include the following canonical tag in the <head> of the republished story.

<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.ednc.org/day-17-convention/">

HTML content

This includes the title, byline, content, and tracking pixel required for republishing this story.

This story is tagged:

Saturday, February 1, 1868

The Convention was called to order on Saturday at 11 o’clock, Mr. Pres. Cowles in the Chair. No issues related to public schools were addressed on this day.

On a matter entirely unrelated to the constitution, the Convention took up a petition for divorce. Individual petitions have been brought to the full body since the second week of the session. Mr. Jones, of Washington, read from the Revised Code the law of North Carolina in relation to divorce, three causes set forth: impotency, adultery, or any other just cause—as cruelty, which endangers life. The policy of the State had been against divorce. Mr. Jones said that the more tenacious laws are upon that subject, the better the population. The regulations of other States are regarded as loose—tending, it appeared, to bastardize the issue of marriages. There was no proof of impotency, or adultery or other just cause in this case. But because of incompatibility of temper, these parties call upon this Convention to ignore all precedent. Because a man and woman do not choose to live together, a divorce is to be granted here, and it is set down upon the journal of this Convention, in order to permit each to choose another partner. Why did not they apply to the Courts? The presumption is that, being known too well, they knew that no advantage could be gained there. Why come here? Because the parties believe there is less regard for law here. Mr. Jones moved to postpone the matter indefinitely.

Delegates also discussed a relief ordinance for persons suffering from bankruptcy. This led to comments made by Mr. Tourgee – again – of his interpretation that North Carolina no longer could be recognized as a political entity.   He declared that the “State is dead.” This led to a lengthy discussion of the legal authority of the State during this time. Without any action being taken, on motion the Convention adjourned.

 

Resources

Ferrell, Joseph, ed., Compilation of the Official Report of the Proceedings of the Convention (Chapel Hill, N.C.: unpublished manuscript 2007). (See day 8 for fuller explanation of this resource.) (Note: EdNC has converted quotes back to first person/present tense; descriptions Mr. Jones’ comments on divorce are close to verbatim in how described in the Daily Standard.)