Skip to content
EdNC. Essential education news. Important stories. Your voice.

Search ednc.org

Bills flow through Senate education committee

Share this story

Our republishing policy

EdNC is a nonprofit, online, daily, independent newspaper. All of EdNC’s content is open source and free to republish. Please use the following guidelines when republishing our content.
  • Our content must be republished in full. If your organization uses a paywall, the content must be provided in full for free.
  • Credit our team by including both the author name and EdNC.org in the byline. Example: Alex Granados, EdNC.org.
  • If republishing the story online, please provide a link to EdNC.org or a link to the original article in either the byline or credit line.
  • The original headline of the article must be used. Allowable edits to the content of the piece include changes to meet your publication’s style guide and references to dates (i.e. this week changed to last week). Other edits must be approved by emailing Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected].
  • Photos and other multimedia elements (audio, video, etc.) may not be republished without prior permission. Please email Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected] if you are interested in sharing a multimedia element.
  • If you republish a story, please let us know by emailing Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected].

Please email Hannah Vinueza McClellan at [email protected] if you have any questions. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Canonical tag

Please include the following canonical tag in the <head> of the republished story.

<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.ednc.org/bills-flow-senate-education-committee/">

HTML content

This includes the title, byline, content, and tracking pixel required for republishing this story.

This story is tagged:

With a compromise budget on the horizon, legislators are pushing bills through committees, and the Senate education committee is no exception. 

Four bills made their way through the committee today, with three described by sponsors as largely technical. The more substantive bill, House Bill 149, addresses students with dyslexia and dyscalculia.

“It’s an issue that I’ve been working on for some time and was inspired by a wonderful young man in my district,” said Sen. Debra Conrad, R-Forsyth. She said the young man recently graduated from high school. 

Conrad explained that up until this point, the state has no adopted definition of dyslexia or dyscalculia. 

Conrad worked with the state Department of Public Instruction to come up with a definition of dyslexia that will be adopted by the State Board of Education. 

The definition in the bill is as follows: 

“Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurobiological in origin. It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective classroom instruction. Secondary consequences may include problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede growth of vocabulary and background knowledge.”

Dyscalculia is a disability marked by trouble learning or understanding arithmetic. There is no specific definition set forth in the bill. 

The bill includes teacher professional development opportunities related to the disabilities — particularly in students’ early years when there is a big emphasis on reading. 

“This is just going to be another tool to address the individual issue that children are dealing with,” Conrad said. 

The bill also directs school boards to look at various software programs that can help them in identifying the disorders. 

Sen. Tamara Barringer, R-Wake, shared her own connection with dyslexia. She mentioned her experience with having foster children in her home and noted one such child who had dyslexia and a genius level verbal IQ. Barringer said that until the third grade, that child would memorize books.

“She thought that’s what you do to read,” Barringer said. 

In third grade, the books got so large that the child could no longer simply memorize them, and that’s when she was identified as having dyslexia. 

Barringer also sought to dispel the commonly believed notion that people with dyslexia simply see words backwards. She said that her foster child saw the letters in words in different orders every time she read them. 

“Reading is never going to be easy for her because she still struggles with it—  because it truly is a disability,” Barringer said. 

Sen. Chad Barefoot, R-Wake, co-chair of the committee said the bill has been “a long time coming.” 

“I think all of us have heard the stories of people who have been affected by this,” he said. 

A bill to modify the UNC Laboratory Schools program also passed the committee.

The UNC lab schools were created in the budget last session. UNC-system institutions would create these schools to try to improve student performance in low-performing schools while also training teachers and principals to better handle issues commonly seen from students in such schools. 

The bill was described by Rep. Craig Horn, R-Union as largely technical, with only minor substantive changes: it increases the number of institutions creating lab schools from eight to nine and gives them one more year of preparation. 

He said that UNC-system schools of education are designed around high quality teacher preparation. But he added that not every teacher prep school is high quality and that there is work to do. 

“So, we’re going to push the UNC system,” he said. “That’s why we pushed from eight to nine.” 

The original legislation had eight lab schools up and running by the 2018-19 school year. The bill considered today says that at least nine lab schools will begin by the 2019-20 school year instead. Horn said further adjustments can be made as the program develops. 

“Like a lot of things around here, we’ll build the airplane as we fly it,” he said. 

All the bills that passed the committee today will make a stop in the Senate Rules Committee. 

“That’s not a death sentence,” Barefoot said, to which someone else replied: “Anymore.”

The Rules Committee used to have a reputation for being a place where bills do not advance.